Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/46
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tayyab Noor | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ayisha Imran | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hassan Raza | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shereen Umer | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nauman A. Malik | - |
dc.contributor.author | A.S. Chughtai | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-27T10:33:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-27T10:33:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-31 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/46 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction The Chughtai Laboratory collects blood samples for complete blood counts from various hospitals, emergency departments, ICUs, and through home sampling services all across the country. The preanalytical phase is an integral component of laboratory medicine. A laboratory report has a key role in patient treatment and the clinician's decision in the management of the disease. Preanalytical errors are most frequently caused by the absence of a sample and/or inappropriate understanding of a test request, mislabeling, contamination from the sampling site, hemolyzed, clotted, insufficient samples, storage issues, and inappropriate blood to anticoagulant proportion or inappropriate choice of anticoagulant. Objective To identify the cause of rejection rates of the complete blood count samples and reduce the rejection rates by improving the accuracy of the results and lowering pre-analytical errors. Methods This cross-sectional study was done in the Hematology Department of Chughtai Laboratory's head office in Lahore between 19-06-2021 and 19-10-2021. Simple random sampling was applied to collect the data. About 3 ml of each blood sample was received in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) vial, inspected visually, run on Sysmex XN-9000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan), and was reviewed on peripheral smears. Results Out of 231,008 blood samples, 11,897 (5.15%) samples were rejected. The most common pre-analytical mistake was storage issues due to transportation delay (19.45%) followed by wrong medical records (19.16%), diluted samples (16.35%), incorrect tubes (16.01%), hemolyzed samples (15.13%), unlabeled samples (10.01%), and clotted sample (3.88%). Conclusion In the hematology department, the total rejection rate observed during the study period was 5.15%. Recognition of preanalytical errors and avoiding them will help us lower the sample rejection rate and raise the overall quality of laboratory management. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cureus | en_US |
dc.subject | frequency | en_US |
dc.subject | sample rejection | en_US |
dc.subject | pre-analytical errors | en_US |
dc.subject | hematology | en_US |
dc.subject | complete blood count | en_US |
dc.title | An Overview of Complete Blood Count Sample Rejection Rates in a Clinical Hematology Laboratory Due to Various Preanalytical Errors | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Haematology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
20230131-7257-j2eeg3.pdf | 189 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.